aA
Minority shareholder of Vilniaus Prekyba Mindaugas Marcinkevičius unlawfully and unfairly provoked temporal halt of sale of Akropolis shopping centres, the Supreme Court of Lithuania (LAT) has announced.
The Supreme Court: Marcinkevičius tried sabotaging Akropolis shopping centres deal
© DELFI / Domantas Pipas

After investigating the complaint of Vilniaus Prekyba, which acquired Akropolis shopping centres, on Friday, the Supreme Court of Lithuania has overturned the unfavourable decisions of the Vilnius Regional and Appeals Courts and obliged the court of first instance to reassess the possible damage caused by Marcinkevičius. Information about court’s decision was given BNS news service by representatives of Vilniaus Prekyba. The Supreme Court of Lithuania held a non-public hearing of the case, thus the decision remained undisclosed. “The Supreme Court of Lithuania agreed on what we had been claiming from the beginning – that Marcinkevičius had been acting unlawfully, unfairly and abused his rights by halting the transfer of Akropolis shopping centres. We hope that the court of first instance will properly evaluate the damage done,” the representative of Vilniaus Prekyba Lukas Radžiūnas said.

Marcinkevičius' lawyer Kęstutis Švirinas told BNS that transfer of this property could not cause any damage. “In our opinion, this was not a conventional business transaction when the property is acquired by an entity unrelated to the seller. The subject matter in this case is not the sale itself, but the transfer of asset management rights when they went from one legal entity to another, thus any loses or damage are out of question,” Švirinas commented.

According to the lawyer, the decision of the Supreme Court of Lithuania opposes the decisions of the lower courts, which confirms that courts may disagree on certain issues, thus the case will reviewed. “My client’s position remains the same. The transaction in question was a conventional transfer of asset management rights from one legal entity to another involving the same person. Both parties to the transaction were controlled by the same shareholders, so no damage can arise from this transaction,” Švirinas said.

In May 2016, Vilniaus Prekyba from legal entity Relvit in Malta for more than 400 million euros acquired Akropolis shopping centres and legal entities managing or owning real estate objects – Akropolis Group, Akropolis Real Estate and Nikola Mushanov Projektas. In 2015, Vilniaus Prekyba wanted to buy Akropolis shopping centres for the first time, but Marcinkevičius tried to halt the deal in court, explaining that he lacked information to help him decide on voting. According to Vilniaus Prekyba, due to Marcinkevičius’ actions, the transaction was delayed for more than a year, and during that time the market value of the Akropolis had increased significantly, thus the price had risen for 81.2 million euros above the previous agreement.

Already for several years Marcinkevičius, having more than 10% of shares in various companies of Vilniaus Prekyba group, has been in conflict with the main shareholder of the group Nerijus Numavičius; businessmen both directly and indirectly have been defending their interests in court. In the summer of 2015, Marcinkevičius publicly announced that after his resignation as CEO of company controlling Akropolis shopping centres drastic changes had taken place: dozens of holding companies were set up in order to separate existing companies from the group's shareholders. Marcinkevičius claimed that in Vilniaus Prekyba “extremely aggressive” tax planning system was applied. Vilniaus Prekyba denies the accusations of tax evasion and claims that Marcinkevičius aims at withdrawing from the group under favourable conditions.

BNS
It is prohibited to copy and republish the text of this publication without a written permission from UAB „BNS“.

Foreign Minister doubts business could be obliged to cut ties with Russia

MP Raimundas Lopata recently proposed adopting a law that would oblige Lithuanian companies to...

Adviser: 3rd electricity market liberalization stage should be postponed

The process of electricity market liberalization in Lithuania is failing, therefore, its third stage...

Regulator: Perlas Energija may lose electricity supply licence

The National Energy Regulatory Council (VERT), having analysed legislation, concluded that independent...

Minister: decision by Perlas Energija to abolish fixed-rate plans for electricity was unlawfu

Minister of Energy Dainius Kreivys has stated that the National Energy Regulatory Council (VERT)...

Unemployment rate stood at 5.2%

Statistics Lithuania reports that based on data of the Statistical Survey on Employment, in Q2 2022,...

Top news

Landsbergis: finding ways to pay for Kaliningrad transit is Moscow’s task, not Vilnius’

It is Moscow’s task, and not that of Vilnius, to find ways to make payments for the services related...

Seimas speaker: Kyiv is now bridge to Europe for Belarus

Viktorija Čmilytė-Nielsen, Speaker of the Seimas, says that two years ago the people of Lithuania...

Bomb threat made against Belarusian opposition’s event

On Tuesday, the police received an email with threats of bomb explosions in multiple buildings in...

Adviser: 3rd electricity market liberalization stage should be postponed

The process of electricity market liberalization in Lithuania is failing, therefore, its third stage...

Presidency will consider stripping figure skaters of state awards if they perform in Russia amid war in Ukraine

The presidency will consider stripping Lithuania’s figure skaters Povilas Vanagas and Margarita...