aA
Minority shareholder of Vilniaus Prekyba Mindaugas Marcinkevičius unlawfully and unfairly provoked temporal halt of sale of Akropolis shopping centres, the Supreme Court of Lithuania (LAT) has announced.
The Supreme Court: Marcinkevičius tried sabotaging Akropolis shopping centres deal
© DELFI / Domantas Pipas

After investigating the complaint of Vilniaus Prekyba, which acquired Akropolis shopping centres, on Friday, the Supreme Court of Lithuania has overturned the unfavourable decisions of the Vilnius Regional and Appeals Courts and obliged the court of first instance to reassess the possible damage caused by Marcinkevičius. Information about court’s decision was given BNS news service by representatives of Vilniaus Prekyba. The Supreme Court of Lithuania held a non-public hearing of the case, thus the decision remained undisclosed. “The Supreme Court of Lithuania agreed on what we had been claiming from the beginning – that Marcinkevičius had been acting unlawfully, unfairly and abused his rights by halting the transfer of Akropolis shopping centres. We hope that the court of first instance will properly evaluate the damage done,” the representative of Vilniaus Prekyba Lukas Radžiūnas said.

Marcinkevičius' lawyer Kęstutis Švirinas told BNS that transfer of this property could not cause any damage. “In our opinion, this was not a conventional business transaction when the property is acquired by an entity unrelated to the seller. The subject matter in this case is not the sale itself, but the transfer of asset management rights when they went from one legal entity to another, thus any loses or damage are out of question,” Švirinas commented.

According to the lawyer, the decision of the Supreme Court of Lithuania opposes the decisions of the lower courts, which confirms that courts may disagree on certain issues, thus the case will reviewed. “My client’s position remains the same. The transaction in question was a conventional transfer of asset management rights from one legal entity to another involving the same person. Both parties to the transaction were controlled by the same shareholders, so no damage can arise from this transaction,” Švirinas said.

In May 2016, Vilniaus Prekyba from legal entity Relvit in Malta for more than 400 million euros acquired Akropolis shopping centres and legal entities managing or owning real estate objects – Akropolis Group, Akropolis Real Estate and Nikola Mushanov Projektas. In 2015, Vilniaus Prekyba wanted to buy Akropolis shopping centres for the first time, but Marcinkevičius tried to halt the deal in court, explaining that he lacked information to help him decide on voting. According to Vilniaus Prekyba, due to Marcinkevičius’ actions, the transaction was delayed for more than a year, and during that time the market value of the Akropolis had increased significantly, thus the price had risen for 81.2 million euros above the previous agreement.

Already for several years Marcinkevičius, having more than 10% of shares in various companies of Vilniaus Prekyba group, has been in conflict with the main shareholder of the group Nerijus Numavičius; businessmen both directly and indirectly have been defending their interests in court. In the summer of 2015, Marcinkevičius publicly announced that after his resignation as CEO of company controlling Akropolis shopping centres drastic changes had taken place: dozens of holding companies were set up in order to separate existing companies from the group's shareholders. Marcinkevičius claimed that in Vilniaus Prekyba “extremely aggressive” tax planning system was applied. Vilniaus Prekyba denies the accusations of tax evasion and claims that Marcinkevičius aims at withdrawing from the group under favourable conditions.

BNS
It is prohibited to copy and republish the text of this publication without a written permission from UAB „BNS“.

Lithuania bans Russian gas imports except transit to Kaliningrad

Lithuania has passed a law banning Russian natural gas imports into the country, except for gas...

Key Lithuanian companies protected from Russian, Belarusian control

As Latvia last week banned Russian and Belarusian legal or natural persons from holding stakes in or...

Lithuania and Kazakhstan aim to develop economic ties and transport connections

Lithuania and Kazakhstan seek to increase the volume of bilateral trade through much closer...

Court: Belaruskali and LTG contract posed threat to national security

The contract between Belarusian fertilizer producer Belaruskali and Lietuvos Gelezinkeliai (Lithuanian...

Two more sanctioned companies may be placed under temporary administration

Lithuania's Financial Crime Investigation Service (FCIS) mulls placing under temporary administration...

Top news

Anusauskas: NATO leaders approve decision on brigades on eastern flank

NATO leaders in Madrid on Wednesday confirmed their intention to increase the Alliance's forces...

Nauseda hopes for "good start" on air defense at NATO summit

Lithuanian President Gitanas Nauseda says the NATO summit in Madrid will give a good push to the...

Defence Minister: cyber attack organizers look for weak spots may target businesses

Organized Russia-linked cyber attacks against Lithuania have reached such a large scale for the first...

Landsbergis: EU concessions on Kaliningrad transit would create extra problems

The European Commission's concessions to sanctions on the transit of some goods between mainland...

Lithuania bans Russian gas imports except transit to Kaliningrad

Lithuania has passed a law banning Russian natural gas imports into the country, except for gas...